Verses

 

This morning Jug Suraiya the famous columnist took to Speaking Tree, rather than his usual third editorial space on the universality or otherwise of 'universe'. The point to ponder is whether there is a single universe or many universes which emanated from the Big Bang. Well, honestly, if there are more than one, then it ceases to be a 'uni-verse', it can be 'bi-verse' or 'tri-verse' or even 'multi-verse'. I would like to believe, there is just one though, keeping it simple, else it would only get 'worse'. So if there is a universe as a product of the Big Bang, is there a case for a 'Re-verse' before it.  We would not be 'a-verse' to the idea at least. We have hardly 'tra-versed' the universe as we know it, but we have been composing 'verses' on the 'vers'-atility of this universe of ours. The di-'versity' of the topic is intriguing and no uni-'versity' is prepared to study even the in-'verse' of this ad-‘versity’.

Without tra-‘versing’ to the trans-‘verse’ section of the uni-‘verse’ we would be oblivious to the ob-‘verse’ which would give ad-‘verse’ publicity to the ‘vers’-atile populace of the philosophers. They are generally quite well versed with the contro-‘verse’ and can address them even without any con-‘vers’-ation. They o-‘vers’-ee the travesty and look at all the per-‘verse’ effects of the "us" versus "them" and are genuinely anguished by the re-‘vers’al in fortunes of sanity in general. To the un-‘versed’ these may seem to be a case of o-‘verse’nsitivity  over trivial issues but with all these Satanic verses appearing all at the same time, it is but obvious there is some sub-‘vers’ive plot being hatched. We need to summon well-‘versed’ and trained minds to unearth the mysteries of various versions of Universe.

As though this was not enough, it is time for Meta-'verse' now. So no more re-verses now, May a hundred verses bloom!!