Saturday 2 November 2024

OUT OF THE BOX THINKING


 

In the Armed Forces, the senior hierarchy normally exhorts the youngsters to indulge in “Out of the box thinking”. The irony of this sermon is that most of them themselves have been treading the beaten path, as that is safe and secure. Any deviations and you are treading in a dangerous zone, where a failure may end up in premature culmination of a promising professional career.  As they say ‘better to be safe than sorry’, so no unnecessary risks is the mantra for success. 

But ‘nothing ventured nothing gained’ and while sticking to the laid down SOPs are ok for peace time activities, operations are a different ball game altogether. No operational plan survives the first bullet being fired. All contingency planning comes to a nought, as the adversary surprises you with an altogether different approach. This creative ‘out of the box’ thinking is absolutely essential for mere survival in counter insurgency operations, one has to think like the terrorist to be able to defeat him. 


I am sure all of us are seized of this dictum, but the million dollar question remains as to how do we inculcate this in the youngsters. First and foremost, our system of assessment for professional courses and exams needs a de novo look. I will illustrate this with a simple example, I was preparing for Staff College Entrance Exam along with a friend who is from the Special Forces during our Pre-Staff Course. We were attempting a Cordon and Search appreciation as a practice test, while I followed the script, he followed what he actually did during the operations. During the discussions I tried explaining to him the need to stick to the script, but he felt otherwise. As luck would have it, our Tactics “B” paper had us attempting a Cordon & Search operation itself and sure enough, I qualified, while he couldn’t. 


Same story is repeated during the War games, Operational Alert exercises etc, Red or Yellow Land always ends up losing it, even if their Commander had a better plan. Aim being that wrong lesson of Blue Land succumbing should not be taken home, but I think it is actually counter productive as the whole thing is stage managed and ingenuity or innovative thinking is given a short shrift. 


To be able to think differently, one has to be creative and of a fertile imagination, only then one can conceive “Out of the box” plans and this must be practised and encouraged during peace time activities. If all our lives, we haven’t done it, we can’t suddenly become a Guderian, Rommel  or Zorawar during war. Creativity has to be nurtured and leaders need to be given this opportunity to indulge in these activities on a day to day basis. To be able to act out of the box, one has to first think out of the box, but our thinking process has become so straightjacketed with years of regimentation that this knot needs a deliberate effort to disentangle.


Encourage creativity by motivating the young officers to pursue a hobby, writing, painting, music, photography, dance, anything at all, but this aspect needs to be addressed as a vital trait of character and should be commented upon by the officers in chain of command. Originality has become a rare commodity, especially in this era of Artificial Intelligence where Chatgpt rules the roost. By no stretch of imagination am I advocating that creative pursuits be  the only criteria for judging an individual, but unless he or she finds that it has a productive value, it will not be an honest effort. Our question papers in Promotion exams should also not be rote based, but rely on ground knowledge acquired in the units. Similarly our thesis during Higher Command and NDC must focus on challenging topics which are not the usual run of the mill topics which have been thrashed out a million times already with nothing substantial emerging as an output. Articles in the magazines published by our think tanks are also not meeting international standards. May be making military history campaigns and biographies an yearly effort for all officers will nudge them towards professional reading, as even that aspect is highly neglected. 


Since we are highly regimented, we have ourselves created the proverbial box, we follow drills, procedures, SOPs thus remaining in the box. To set ourselves free and break these shackles we need an outlet where we don’t get stuck, that is where these creative pursuits will help. We also need to get rid of this tyranny of ranks, mere seniority in rank does not anoint anyone as the ultimate knower of the truth. The urge to be a “Yes” man stems from this very fact, wisdom and seniority are not always complementary. Professional respect is earned by your deeds and reputation in the organisation and not by your rank per se. So youngsters shun this timidity and bash on regardless, be original, be creative, because that will breed excellence. 






21 comments:

sheraz varma said...

War, being both, a scientific thing and an art thing. Is perhaps the most difficult trade to master. The backbenchers go to politics, the front ones to IITs et al... We can't then shrug. Some remain in the box, few dare step outside . But the box is important, it forms a formidable unit of doing things.

Sudhir said...

👍

Sofie said...

I notice that you have stirred up a debatable topic. To think outside the box one has to first know what lies within the box. That having been said, I do feel the Armed Forces would do well to invest time in creative thinking, as against critical thinking, for one is a left brain as against the other which is a right brain activity.

Anonymous said...

Absolutely true

Anonymous said...

Profound insight as always

Simha said...

Ha Ha Ha! I've actually been waiting long for this to come from you, 'cause you've got the knack of banging the nail's head! Though a 'Romantic' piece, this is likely to be treated as "letting in a cat in a birds' cage" by the 'Conventionals'. And, though you may have succeeded in getting the desired results on grnd by adopting to out of the box methods during major ex, the nay-saying Gokus are too many in numbers to pull you down - I should know! Hats off to you for this 'out of the box' piece!!

Anonymous said...

Risk taking and delegation of authority are two essential traits of any senior...but alas...if a senior/ leader is secure about his competence all will thrive...and out of box thinking will automatically take place...yours etc

GladiatorAdi said...

Amazing as always!

Anil/F70 said...

Noble intentions of ingraining" Out of the box Thinking" amongst the Younger / Middle level leadership Fraternity through this Article is well appreciated.This can only get the right impetus,when " Pinks",DS Solutions,PCK are ruthlessly done away with and given absymally low weightage in the Assessment Matrix.Logical and Workable Solutions / Plans need to be encouraged by the Top Military Brass.

Sanjeev Pandit said...

Hi Suyash ! A well written piece ! Unfortunately, in the Armed Forces, if you have a good memory, you can outstand in professional courses, and get categorized and glorified as a 'scholar soldier'. Such 'scholar soldiers' obviously fail to deliver professionally, when they encounter issues/situations which were not mentioned in the precis. Furthermore, their knowledge of precis is also limited to 'examination oriented' topics. While on JC, we studied the concept of Multiple Patrols in FIBUA. During examination, when a question on Multiple Patrols was asked, an officer gave a prelude to his answer, mentioning that the concept of Multiple Patrols had emerged in Ireland in the 1960s, when the British Army was fighting the IRA. Not surprisingly, the officer was mocked at a public forum for mentioning it, since the DS himself was unaware of it, though the Precis had mentioned it. So even the knowledge of DS was limited to examination oriented requirements. So what can one expect from such scenarios? Officers who are trained to comply with the rigid requirements of an examination. They will never think out of the box, since for them, thinking out of the box is blasphemy. We are trained and become habitual, to conform.

Anonymous said...

Albert E=mc2 abdul kalam well tesla super sonic jets Elon A williams not to forget aka ramesh sharma we need out of Box for project X n Team Ldrs can make it happen...sure Out of Box awesome write up 🌟

Anonymous said...

Nice blog, it has a usage in ltd ops, more so in CI.
At conventional it has to be mix & match of OOB thinking,resources, SOPs .All depends on how bold is the plan & Cdrs risk taking capability.

Yadvendra Jadon said...

The way things are change which is inevitable seems to be not happening for mammoth of an organisation called Army. That leaves only the beaten path to be trodden upon to reach the lofty heights of higher ranks.

Case in point is how many of the highly decorated ones or for that matter who have most regimental service which involves a considerable time in the field, reach the higher hierarchy.

Change will not come, it will be forced by circumstances to make people think out of the box.

Well written Sir.

Anonymous said...

To live a creative life, we must lose our fear of being wrong. 'But to achieve dream, most of us put the head down and walk the beaten path. Follow along, don't take risk and achieve wonders' ✨️ Congratulations Suyash!....your risks are always rewarded. @ Hope! Because the stone wheel has transformed into wheels of rovers for Moon and now Venus. # HOPE!!

Anonymous said...

A Paradox well highlighted Suyash- Arun

Anonymous said...

Excellent! Very well said sir!
The best substitute to battlefield experience is realistic training! Unless we open our minds through rigorous education and training “out of the box “ thinking is an illusion! The PME set up and pattern at all levels need a change…. DSSC, HC, NDC are excellent platforms where a large pool of officers are available for brain storming and generating solutions to a sea of problems that our armed forces face. But nothing revolutionary comes out of these courses batch after batch - even the officers view the course as a mere career progression. Alas! During our SAASS course in USAF, the 45 course officers were divided into 5 batches and asked to generate solutions to real problems if USAF,. These teams presented solutions to 3 star Generals from Pentagon who came down to the college. Not only did they accept the solutions. But took some officers as team to implement the solution. Here the Staff officers are asked to change notes on file to align with the Sr commander’s POV!

V Pramod Kumar said...

Well said, Suyash. I absolutely agree with you. Great read.

jeetu said...

Our outdated ACR system needs to be changed for any reform in Army. Promotions are linked to pleasing the boss and actual talent and knowledge takes a back seat. Reverse ACR system, a bigger data base to capture an officer’s capabilities from day one, use of software to weed out sudden ups and downs in marking system etc would give junior officers strength to speak up their mind and follow their passions. SOPs can not win a war- junior leadership can!

Anonymous said...

Real nice. But food for thought. We need to increase the size of the box not look at out of box thinking. As we increase the box meaning being more aware then we can generate more options - hence be more effective. Linked to this it is my belief that one can imagine something if he has seen. Like if man had not seen birds flying maybe nobody would have dreamt of flying, building ac. Hence DISCOVERY IS MORE IMPORTANT THAN INVENTION. invention is based on discovery. Which leads to my earlier point that we need to increase our box each passing moment. My two bits.

Anonymous said...

Sycophancy is part of Indian society. Hence, armed forces are no different. It is expected out of bureaucrats, police officers by there political masters, by junior officers in any civil government hierarchy, by subordinates in a private company even MNCs. It is also expected by the parents from their children. Thus armed forces are no different. Such a value system has to emerge from the foundation level. It is the job of the leaders (not political) to give direction to the society. Encouragement of the creativity involves breaking the stereotype and accepting mistakes. Unless parents do not accept that from their children and teachers do not accept it from their students, this system will never grow up in the armed forces. It is for this reason that our R&D set up is still struggling to take root, it is for this reason that we still follow the rules of the colonial era. Change will come but the same needs to start from our homes and schools, the very foundation of our next generation.

C SPrabhakat said...

Need of the hour. Either we change ourself or we will be forced to change. The new gen wants new ideas and new thinking.